Home
About Us
What We Do
Activities
Members
Steering Council
Join Us!
Resource Materials
Links
Photo Gallery
Take Action
Media Release
Archives
Articles in Other
Languages
Artículos en Espanõl
Artikel di bahasa Indonesia

PEOPLE'S ORGANIZATIONS DEMAND FOOD SOVEREIGNTY ON THE OCCASION OF THE WORLD SUMMIT ON FOOD SECURITY

Press Release by PAN AP, 13 November 2009

An Open Letter signed by 140 organizations was sent to Mr. Jacques Diouf, Director General of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), on the occasion of the World Summit on Food Security in Rome to be held from the 16-18 November 2009.

The letter, entitled Look Beyond Tried and Tired Strategies to People's Solutions for Hunger and Poverty, was coordinated by the Pesticide Action Network Asia and the Pacific (PAN AP) and signed by members of 140 organizations representing women, consumers, fisherfolk, small farmers, indigenous people, landless peasants, agricultural workers, trade unions, migrant workers and researchers from 18 countries in Asia Pacific and Africa.

"The third World Summit on Food Security should not be a travesty of justice with 'more of the same' solutions to hunger and food insecurity," said Sarojeni Rengam, Executive Director of PAN AP. "In the thirteen years since the first World Summit in 1996, the number of hungry and under-nourished has increased to over a billion at a rate of 40 million in each of the last two years. Continuing to pursue the same strategies is not an option; we must learn to listen to the people and implement a new system of biodiversity based ecological agriculture with small farmers at the centre."

Responding to a draft of the objectives and possible decisions of the World Summit on Food Security, the open letter makes a critical appeal to the FAO to recognize and dismantle the neo-liberalist, corporate model of agriculture in favour of a new global food production system based on food sovereignty and environmental sustainability.

The people's organizations call on the FAO to:

  • Create a Convention on Food Sovereignty to enshrine the principles of food sovereignty and institute food sovereignty as the principal policy framework for food and agriculture;
  • Initiate a process of implementation and monitoring of the International Conference on Agrarian Reforms and Rural Development (ICARRD) recommendations;
  • Provide leadership by establishing mechanisms that ensure international conventions and trade agreements related to food and agriculture guarantee North-South respect and cooperation, uphold human rights, promote genuine agrarian reforms, ensure sustainability and accountability in dealing with natural resources, and reject all manner of privatisation of life-forms and the development of genetically engineered crops/food;
  • Support research and development that is based on the needs of communities and carried out through consultative, participatory methods such that the solutions truly fit the needs of the people and are led by them;
  • To utilize the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) report as a central tool for the future strategies of the FAO on poverty eradication and agricultural development;
  • Provide aid free of conditionalities, and monitor philanthropy;
  • Dismantle the Agreement on Agriculture and take the WTO out of agriculture;
  • Support small, biodiversity based ecological agriculture and not corporate monocultures.

The continuing food and financial crises offer the FAO an opportunity to break from its past shortcomings and failures and make a fresh start, beginning with a historic paradigm shift to achieve a sustainable and equitable system of food production and distribution. This can well happen if the FAO listens to the voices from the ground and provides a greater and more proactive working space for the civil society organizations and people's movements in bringing the people's representation and perspectives to the discussion table.

The Open Letter is also available at www.panap.net.

For more information contact:
Brione Bruce
Program Officer
Pesticide Action Network Asia and the Pacific
P.O. Box 1170, Penang
10850 Malaysia
Tel: 604-657 0271 or 604-656 0381
E-mail: panap@panap.net

------------------------------------

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE FAO ON THE OCCASION OF THE WORLD SUMMIT ON FOOD SECURITY

13 November 2009

To,
Mr Jacques Diouf
Director General
Food and Agriculture Organization
Viale delle Terme di Caracalla
00153 Rome
ITALY

Regarding : Aide Memoire - Look Beyond Tried and Tired Strategies, to People's Solutions for Hunger and Poverty

Dear Mr Diouf,

The third World Summit on Food Security could not be taking place at a more critical time in modern history - the world is deep in the throes of multiple crises namely, the food, financial and climate crises with no concrete solutions in sight. Unfortunately, the last two World Food Summits (WFS) have given the people, especially the poor, little to hope for - there is no food security in the world today for most of its six billion inhabitants. In the thirteen years since the first WFS in 1996, the number of hungry and under-nourished has actually increased to over a billion at a rate of 40 million in each of the last two years: a bleak testimony to the failure of the food and agricultural policies adopted by governments, the FAO and other global institutions. Eighty percent of this one billion live in Asia and two-thirds are peasant farmers and landless labourers. The neo-liberalist agenda of trade liberalization and monopoly capitalism has been well served by the WTO's Agreement on Agriculture (AoA), TRIPs and TRIPs Plus and other international and bilateral instruments which have commodified food and destroyed domestic food security. The face of agriculture today is that of huge monoculture farms filled with poisonous pesticides, agrofuel plantations, cash crops, genetically engineered crops carrying huge risks to human health and the environment, impoverished rural farming communities, and millions of displaced indigenous peoples and peasants. Moreover, the UN High Level Task Force on the Food Crisis and its Comprehensive Framework of Action (CFA) in 2008 does not appear to be making any concrete headway because it is not addressing the root of the problem. If anything, the divide between the rich and the poor has grown wider and deeper.

This aide memoire from the people's movements of Asia is in response to the draft "Secretariat contribution to defining the objectives and possible decisions of the World Summit on Food Security on 16, 17 & 18 November 2009" (hereinafter called the Draft Declaration of the WFS 2009). It is a critical appeal to the FAO to recognize and dismantle the neo-liberalist, corporate model of agriculture that has crippled the food security of the world and to make an unequivocal move towards developing a new global food production system based on food sovereignty and environmental sustainability, with small food producers at the centre of agriculture. This is even more urgent in the face of the climate crisis where millions, especially in the South, have to face unprecedented climatic disasters for which they are ill-prepared. This third WFS should not be a travesty of justice with the "more of the same" formula being the order of the day. The time is NOW for the FAO to redeem itself as a world body dedicated to ensuring a sustainable and equitable state of food and agriculture for all, especially the poor.

People-Centred Solutions
The current state of food insecurity is a direct result of the trade liberalization regime; the emphasis on food grown for export and not for communities has blocked access to food, land and productive resources for the world's poor. Paradoxically, countries with large numbers of people suffering from hunger and malnutrition are the very countries exporting food in large quantities. The situation is made worse by militarization, armed conflicts and wars that have devastated the lives of people and aggravated their food insecurity.

In this context, the FAO provides a unique international space in which the right to food and food sovereignty can be considered beyond the control of the market, and the voice of the global South can be heard. Being the leading specialized UN agency with the capacity to work on food and agriculture issues and a mandate to combat hunger and poverty globally, the FAO is in a position to lead the change that is required to transform the face of food production in the world through a direct, transparent and democratic relationship with NGOs/CSOs and people's movements.

Towards this end, we urge the FAO to seriously consider the following and adopt the necessary changes recommended.

Food Sovereignty: Going Beyond Food Security
Food security, albeit important, addresses only part of the problem of hunger in the world. In order to tackle the root causes of food insecurity and poverty and to ensure a truly sustainable system of food production, it is essential that the food sovereignty of the people, especially small food producers, is recognized and asserted.

Food Sovereignty is the inalienable RIGHT of people, communities and countries - to decide their food and agriculture policies; to adequate, culturally appropriate and safe food; to land and productive resources; to sustainable production and livelihoods; and to gender justice, social justice and environmental justice.

Following the food crisis in 2008, the CFA recommended a series of immediate and long-term measures to address the food crisis. However, by not including the small food producers or their representatives in its formulation, the CFA's overall stress on trade liberalization in agriculture will only continue to facilitate further corporate control over the food chain; strengthening the power structures, approaches and practices which have over time resulted in the collapse of the whole system of food production and the increased hunger and poverty that we are witnessing today.

The Draft Declaration of the WFS 2009 recognizes "The right of everyone to have access to safe and nutritious food, consistent with the right to adequate food and the fundamental right of everyone to be free of hunger." As the FoodFirst Information and Action Network (FIAN) rightly points out in its report1, it is urgent that the right to food be taken beyond the current rhetoric. If food is to be truly recognized as a human right, there must be a parallel system within which people can claim this human right. This parallel system must be grounded upon the principles of food sovereignty.

We commend the FAO for its Right to Food Guidelines and call for their immediate implementation. We further call for a Convention on Food Sovereignty to be drawn up which will enshrine the principles of food sovereignty and institute food sovereignty as the principal policy framework for food and agriculture.

Similarly, the International Conference on Agrarian Reforms and Rural Development (ICARRD), organized by the FAO together with the Brazilian Government in 2006, strongly called for genuine land reforms for the small food producers. However, despite the ICARRD declaration being signed by 92 countries, there has been almost no follow-up. It is important for the FAO to initiate a process of implementation and monitoring of the ICARRD recommendations.

We also urge the FAO to provide leadership by establishing mechanisms that ensure international conventions and trade agreements related to food and agriculture, guarantee North-South respect and cooperation, uphold human rights, promote genuine agrarian reforms, ensure sustainability and accountability in dealing with natural resources, and reject all manner of privatisation of life-forms and the development of genetically engineered crops/food.

Development, Technology and Aid
In development of agricultural and global food security policies, the FAO should recommend and promote multilateral decisions that promote an international order based on justice and respect for life. It must insist that research and development are based on the needs of communities and carried out through consultative, participatory methods such that the solutions truly fit the needs of the people and are led by them.

The International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD), which involved over 400 scientists, institutions and individuals and took four years to complete, recommended a number of changes in the way food and agriculture have been dealt with in the last several decades. It categorically declared that the old paradigm of industrial energy-intensive and toxic agriculture was an outdated concept while small-scale farmers and agro-ecological methods provided the way forward. Yet, since its release in 2008, the IAASTD report continues to be ignored by international organizations. The IAASTD report must be central to the future strategies of the WFS 2009 on poverty eradication and agricultural development.

Rural development must be driven by the people and not by corporations, the WTO, IMF and other similar global bodies. Aid given should be free of conditionalities that keep poor countries trapped in a cycle of exploitation, oppression and debt. The Draft Declaration of the WFS 2009 states that it "highly appreciates the interest shown and resources mobilized for agriculture and food security by private philanthropic foundations in recent years". While we are supportive of increased investment in agriculture, the FAO must ensure that such finances are used in the interests of the people and not to further the agenda of corporations and developed nations. Aid should encompass the concepts of democratic ownership and transparency where true participatory processes with the people at the centre are ensured.

Recent donations by organizations such as the Gates Foundation to promote genetically engineered crops and corporate agriculture in Africa will serve to duplicate the disastrous Green Revolution practices that ravaged Asian agriculture. GE crops haven't proven to increase production, reduce pest infestation or, in fact, reduce the use of pesticides. Are we prepared to once again witness the poisoning of people and lands with pesticides; the destruction of precious native local crop varieties and ecosystems; and the deepening debt and impoverishment of millions of peasants in Africa?

In considering GE crops as a solution to world hunger, the FAO has failed to adhere to the precautionary principle. Furthermore, GE is not just a matter of risk to human health and the environment, the very concept of the private ownership of seeds is a violation of the food sovereignty of farmers everywhere. The FAO would do well to consider the broader and deeper implications of GE food rather than view GE as a convenient techno-fix to eradicate world hunger. It should move away from the reductionist approach to science and technology in agriculture, the disastrous effects of which are well-evidenced by the failed Green Revolution in Asia.

Climate Change and Agriculture
Climate change poses one of the greatest threats to the food security of the world, especially in the South, where its impacts are being manifested the most. Agriculture plays a big role in the climate crisis, accounting for some 13% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It should be noted, however, that corporate agriculture and industrial animal farming with their excessive use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, and effecting large scale land use conversions are the main drivers of these contributions. Synthetic fertilizers are a primary source of nitrous oxide, a potent GHG. Pesticide factories use huge amounts of fossil fuel and transport their products over thousands of miles all around the world. Globalization, responsible for the present ludicrous system of food distribution, is also to blame for the increase in carbon emissions. Trade and the market rather than domestic food security determine where food should be produced, sold and consumed resulting in an absolutely wasteful use of resources in transporting food across the globe.

In contrast to large conventional monoculture corporate farms, small biodiversity-based ecological farms have strong mitigation and adaptation potential. Ecological/Organic farming has been shown to sequester carbon more effectively than conventional/modern farms, and ecological farmers adapt better to climate changes than conventional farmers. Biodiversity-based ecological agriculture ensures community resilience in terms of food security, sustainable livelihoods, social support and adaptive capacity. This should be a key consideration for the WFS 2009.

The Way Forward
We are particularly disturbed by the proposal to "support a successful conclusion of the Doha Round of trade negotiations" as stated in the Draft Declaration of the WFS 2009. The WTO, with its AoA, has played a huge role in the worsening poverty of small-scale farmers and other marginalized sectors in the South. Pursuing the Doha Round would only perpetuate the neo-liberalist agenda of exploitative trade practices which benefit the rich at the expense of the poor. The current state of affairs in trade negotiations clearly shows that subsistence farmers can never be on a level playing field with corporate agricultural giants and subsidized farmers. The Doha negotiations have stalled on the issue of high agricultural subsidies provided by the USA and the EU to their farmers. The inability of the UN to break down the obstinacy of the bigger powers on this issue is evidence that pursing the Doha Round will produce no good end for the people. The WTO has to get out of agriculture and the AoA must be dismantled if there is to be any real hope of securing true food security, food sovereignty and economic justice in the world.

The continuing food and financial crises offer FAO an opportunity to break from its past shortcomings and failures, and make a fresh start, beginning with a historic paradigm shift to achieve a sustainable and equitable system of food production and distribution. This can well happen if the FAO listens to the voices from the ground and provides a greater and proactive working space to the civil society organizations and people's movements in bringing the people's representation and perspectives to the discussion table. The FAO must realize that the policies, strategies and solutions which the WTO, WB, IMF, CGIAR and agribusiness corporations offer have failed to address and solve the problems of hunger and poverty. Continuing to pursue these policies and strategies will only exacerbate the people's problems and miseries. We urge the FAO to take the tragic crises as an opportunity to learn and look to the people for solutions to the problems of world agriculture, food and hunger - solutions that will be real, equitable, sustainable and long-lasting. Otherwise, there will be no real change for the better, and therefore no peace, no justice and no food security for the people of the world.

Signed by:

  1. A.P. Mahila Vyavasay Vruthidarula Union, India
  2. Agrani Foundation, India
  3. Aliansi Gerakan Reforma Agraria (AGRA), Indonesia
  4. All Nepal Peasants' Federation (ANPFa), Nepal
  5. All Nepal Women Association (ANWA), Nepal
  6. Alliance of Peasants in the Cordillera Homeland, Philippines
  7. Alliance of People's Movement, India
  8. Amar Shaheed Chetna Sansthan, India
  9. Amnesty International (Malaysia), Malaysia
  10. Andhra Pradesh Vyavasaya Vruthidarula Union (APVVU), India
  11. AP Matya Karula Union (FISH WORKERS UNION), India
  12. APPL, India
  13. Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development (APWLD), Thailand
  14. Asia Pacific Mission for Migrants (APMM), China
  15. Asian Peasant Coalition (APC), Philippines
  16. Association for Rural Planning and Action (ARPAN), India
  17. Bangladesh Krishok Federation (BKF), Bangladesh
  18. Bangladesh Resource Center for Indigenous Knowledge (BARCIK), Bangladesh
  19. Bantay Bigas, Philippines
  20. Bargad, Pakistan
  21. Beej Bachao Andolan, India
  22. Bhartiya Jan Ewam Prashikshan Sansthan, India
  23. Bhartiya Manaw Samaj Kalyan Sewa Sansthan, India
  24. Brick-klin Workers Movement, India
  25. Bullock Cart Workers Movement, India
  26. Center for Contemporary Studies and Research, India
  27. Center for Social Initiative, India
  28. Centre for Community Economics and Development Consultants Society (CECOEDECON), India
  29. Centre for Sustainable Development (Cenesta), Iran
  30. Champa Devi Jan Kalayan Sewa Sansthan, India
  31. Chipko Pustakalay evam Sanghralay, India
  32. Citizens' alliance in Reforms for Equitable and Efficient Development (CREED), Pakistan
  33. Coalition for Peace in Africa (COPA), Zambia
  34. Committee for Asian Women (CAW), Thailand
  35. Consumers Korea, South Korea
  36. Consumers Union of Japan, Japan
  37. Convenor National Agricultural Workers Forum, India
  38. Cordillera People's Alliance (CPA), Philippines
  39. Cordillera People's Alliance For the Defense of the Ancestral Domain and For Self Determination, Philippines
  40. Cordillera Women's Education Action Research Center (CWEARC), Philippines
  41. Dalit Liberation Movement, India
  42. Dynamic Action Group, India
  43. FANSA U.P., India
  44. Food Security Taskforce Group, Thailand
  45. Future In Our Hands Development Fund, Sri Lanka
  46. GABRIELA - General Assembly Binding Women for Reform, Integrity, Equality, Leadership and Action, Philippines
  47. Gautam Budha Jagriti Samiti, India
  48. Gorakhpur Environmental Action Group, India
  49. Gramin Mahila Rojgar Prashikshan Kendra, India
  50. Gramin Nari Samajothan Sewashram, India
  51. Gramin Vikas Sewa Samiti, India
  52. Human Development Organization (HDO), Sri Lanka
  53. IBON, Philippines
  54. Innabuyog (Alliance of Indigenous Women's Organizations in the Cordillera Region), Philippines
  55. Institute for Research and Documentation in Social Sciences, India
  56. Institute for Zero Waste in Africa, South Africa
  57. International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN), Malaysia (Penang)
  58. International NGO Forum on Indonesian Development (INFID), Indonesia
  59. Irulas Liberation Movement, India
  60. Jan Kalyan Sansthan, India
  61. Jinnah Welfare Society, Pakistan
  62. KALUMARAN Mindanao Alliance of Indigenous Peoples, Philippines
  63. Kalumbay (indigenous peoples organization in Northern Mindanao), Philippines
  64. Kapilwastu Shodh Ewam Vikas Sansthan, India
  65. Khoj-Society for People's Education, Pakistan
  66. Kilusang Magbubukid Ng Pilipinas (KMP), Philippines
  67. Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas-Northern Mindanao region, Philippines
  68. Korea Federation for Environmental Movement ,South Korea
  69. Laghu Seemant Krishak Morcha, India
  70. Landless Labourers Movement, India
  71. Living Farms, India
  72. Lok Sanjh Foundation, Pakistan
  73. Madhuban Sewa Samiti, India
  74. Magsasaka at Siyentipiko para sa Pag-unlad ng Agrikultura (MASIPAG), Philippines
  75. Mathamma Liberation Movement, India
  76. Misamis Oriental Farmers Association (MOFA), Philippines
  77. Mount Valley Development Organization, India
  78. Muskan Jyoti Samiti, India
  79. Nagkahiusang Mag-uuma sa El Salvador (NAMAEL), Philippines
  80. Nagkahiusang Mag-uuma sa Tangcogo (NAGMATA), Philippines
  81. Nari Kalyan Sewa Sansthan, India
  82. National Center for Labour, India
  83. National Federation of Peasant Women (AMIHAN), Philippines
  84. National Fisheries Solidarity Movement, Sri Lanka
  85. National Network Of Agrarian Reform Advocates (NNARA), Philippines
  86. National Network of Indigenous Women's Organizations (BAI), Philippines
  87. Nijera Kori, Bangladesh
  88. NOCHEM-Davao (Non Government Organization Cares for Health and Environment-Davao), Malaysia
  89. Pamalakaya, Philippines
  90. PAN New Zealand, New Zealand
  91. PAN Philippines, Philippines
  92. Panchayat, Pakistan
  93. Panchsheel Development Trust, India
  94. Parawagan Upland Farmers Association (PUFAI), Philippines
  95. Parivartan, India
  96. Parmarth Samaj Sewa Sangathan, India
  97. Partners of Community Organisations (PACOS TRUST), Malaysia
  98. People's Coalition on Food Sovereignty (PCFS), Philippines
  99. Peoples' Network against Liberalization of Agriculture (PUMALAG), Philippines
  100. Philippines Network of Food Security Programmes (PNFSP), Philippines
  101. Pratinidhi Samiti, India
  102. PTS (Women Workers' Union), Philippines
  103. Purvanchal Gramin Sewa Samiti, India
  104. Purvanchal Vikas Sewa Sansthan, India
  105. Quarry Workers Movement, India
  106. Reclaiming Rural Agriculture and Food Sovereignty Action (RRAFA), Thailand
  107. Research Center for Rural Development (RCRD), Vietnam
  108. Research Centre for Gender, Family and Environment in Development (CGFED), Vietnam
  109. Resistance and Solidarity Against Agrochem TNCs (RESIST Network), Philippines
  110. Roots for Equity, Pakistan
  111. Rudra dheeraj Prashikshan Samiti, India
  112. Rural Women Liberation Movement, India
  113. Samudayik Chetna Kendra, India
  114. Sanchit Vikas Sansthan, India
  115. Sandigan Samahang Magsasaka (SASAMAG), Philippines
  116. Sarawak Dayak Iban Association [SADIA], Malaysia
  117. Sex Workers Liberation Movement, India
  118. Shashwat Sansthan, India
  119. Shikha Shastha Unnayan Karzakram (SHISUK), Bangladesh
  120. Shohratgarh Environmental Society, India
  121. Sibol ng Agham at Teknolohiya (SIBAT), Philippines
  122. Society for Equitable Voluntary Actions (SEVA), India
  123. Society for Rural Education and Development (SRED), India
  124. Society of Pollution and Environmental Conservation Scientists (SPECS), India
  125. Southeast Asian Council for Food Security and Fair Trade (SEACON), Malaysia
  126. Sustainable Development Foundation (SDF), Thailand
  127. Tamil Nadu Dalit Women's Movement, India
  128. Tamil Nadu Women's Forum, India
  129. Tanggol Magsasaka, Philippines
  130. Tenaganita, Malaysia
  131. The Lutheran World Federation Nepal (LWF Nepal), Nepal
  132. The NGO Forum, Cambodia
  133. Tungkong Mangga Upland Farmers Association (TMUFAI), Philippines
  134. Unyon ng mga Manggagawa sa Agrikultura (UMA), Philippines
  135. VIKALP, India
  136. Vikalpani National Woman Federation, Sri Lanka
  137. Villanueva-Tagoloan Farmers Association (VTFA), Philippines
  138. Wada Foundation, India
  139. Wildlife and Environment Society of SA, South Africa
  140. Women Solidarity Forum (WSF), Sri Lanka
  141. Women Workers Trade Union, India
  142. Yuva Chetna Kendra, India



Top
People's Coalition on Food Sovereignty (PCFS)
c/o PAN AP
P.O. Box 1170, 10850 Penang, Malaysia
Tel: 604-6570271/6560381 Fax: 604-6583960

E-mail: secretariat@foodsov.org
Copyright 2005-2007 People's Coalition on Food Sovereignty (PCFS)